Ramin Zandi; Mohammad Hossein Sharafzadeh; Ameneh Zare
Volume 5, Issue 18 , December 2021, , Pages 155-166
Abstract
Analysis of the interaction between political texts and its audience, It is one of the most complex and at the same time fascinating cases and areas that can bring attitudes and views ...
Read More
Analysis of the interaction between political texts and its audience, It is one of the most complex and at the same time fascinating cases and areas that can bring attitudes and views towards most of the commitments. Show agreements and what is done in the form of binding and non-binding documents. Based on the descriptive-analytical method, the author, after examining political discourses in terms of critical discourse analysis and revealing the relationship between text and ideology in the Borjam document, showed that no text or speech or writing is neutral. Rather, it depends on the particular situation. This may be completely conscious or unconscious, as well as intentional or unintentional. For this purpose, the researcher based on the Halliday model of fifty sentences(Sentences that have become the material and commentary in the Borjam document (Persian translation)) From Western political figures and fifty sentences from Iranian political figures, taken from Borjam document, Has used content analysis method based on linguistic indicators in this research And in the end, she has mentioned certainty and uncertainty in the sentences of Iranian politicians and Western politicians in the form of statistics, which indicates that she is almost certain .
